The Wheel Turns Your Bike into a Moped
by Collin Dunn, Seattle on 05.10.06
Cars & Transportation
Frequent readers are familiar with TreeHugger's love affair with bicycles, and we've been known to post about the odd Vespa hybrid and electric scooter as well. A new invention by RevoPower brings the two together. The Wheel is a device that easily converts most bikes into 20 mph mopeds, managing to pack a gasoline-powered 23cc, two-stroke internal combustion engine into the space between a standard wheel's spokes. The engine provides a boost at the flick of a switch, claiming that it'll hit 20 mph on a flat surface while coaxing 200 miles per gallon from the engine. While we aren't crazy about either the two-stroke or gasoline internal combustion part, it seems like a pretty nifty device, and if it will get people out and about on two wheels instead of four, all the better. Set to hit the shelves in late 2006 or early 2007, it'll set you back about $400 US to turn your bike into a moped.
The Wheel Turns Your Bike into a Moped
Sat, 07/14/2007 - 16:14
#1
The Wheel Turns Your Bike into a Moped
Who's online
There are currently 0 users online.
Who's new
- eric01
- Norberto
- sarim
- Edd
- OlaOst
FYI
Just thought you all should know that 2-stroke engines will soon be outlawed in the US. I looked into getting one of these several years ago and backed out when I found out you will not be able to use it. My last weed eater is a 4-stroke engine, if you check you will see a whole new crop of small 4-stroke engines are comming on the market to replace the 2-strokers.
I don't remember when the cut-off date is but it is soon. May someone could find it I did a quick search and did not find anything with a date.
Chas S.
My Bicycle Pages
` :jawdrop:
Well I'm busted, I never did completely read the article, just knew is was in Treehuger.
I believe the law is in effect now on new purchases, others are grandfathered in.
I have a Black and Decker Weed Eater that operates off a Battery Pack, but all the land you have, it would be a joke.
If I remember correctly, it has to do with EPA 40 CFR § 90 and what can come into the USA, no more 2 stroke. But I see people ars going to Canada and getting them and parts, then smuggle them back into the USA.
RevoPower 2-stroke to 4-stroke Comparison
Over recent years, 2-stroke engines have gained a bad name from people concerned with emissions. To be candid, older 2-stroke engines contribute to the filthy air in many cities around the world today.
Why then, did RevoPower elect to use 2-stroke engine instead of a 4-stroke engine?
The answer is in two parts. First, modern 2-stroke engines can be produced which actually burn more cleanly than the same size engine in a 4-stroke configuration. RevoPower uses the latest and cleanest technology to ensure compliance with the strict EPA and CARB guidelines.
In addition, there are other major benefits of 2-stroke engines over 4-stroke engines. These include:
* 2-stroke engines work in any orientation, which is required in the Wheel. Standard 4-stroke engines have problems with crankcase oil unless they are upright.
* 2-stroke engines do not have valves, which simplifies their construction, lowers their weight and allows the Wheel to be small enough to rotate between the forks of a bicycle.
* 2-stroke engines fire once every revolution, while 4-stroke engines fire once every other revolution. This makes 2-stroke engines more powerful.
* 2-stroke engines are lighter, simpler and less expensive to manufacture.
Therefore, after considerable exploration, design and comparison, we determined that a 2-stroke engine would best suit our requirements.
Here is a summary of the issues with older 2-stroke engines, and RevoPower's approach:
In conclusion, RevoPower's 2-storke engine is clean and meets all emissions requirements specified in 40 CFR § 90 - Control of Emissions from Nonroad Spark-Ignition Engines at or Below 19 Kilowatts. This specification dictates that the Wheel is viewed as a Class I-A Engine for Exhaust Emissions Standards. These standards are: 50 grams per kilowatt-hour of HC+NOx; and 610 grams per kilowatt-hour of CO. The major benefit of RevoPower's 2-stroke engine is that its CO emissions is substantially below this 610 g/kw-hr threshhold. Stay tuned for an update on this section; we will post the results of our emissions testing.
At $400 it's still a very good deal.
Peace Out,
Gman
Now that we have clarified our beliefs, your invited to join us as we begin building on them to define our Community Mission Statement
Peace Out, <img src="http://tinyurl.com/ysafbn">
Gman
Well it certainly is an interesting concept.
I'm interested in how the emissions really stack up to a 4 cycle of the same hp.
It's definitely a first for me, as far as making an IC engine that will fit within the constraints of a front wheel.
I'm glad that there is research and development in this direction, who knows, perhaps this will lead to other technologies developed to increase the use of smaller, lighter vehicles for day to day transportation.
Thanks for the article GMAN, I love to see new innovations going this direction.
Perhaps we'll see a hybred wheel one of these days that will give us long range as well as help to reduce emissions.
The cost is nice to see!
Maybe this will even spur some competition to get the cost of electric hubs down slightly. :)
How about a wankel engine for bicycles, it didn't go far with cars but maybe in a different application it could.
Dave
MB-1-E
Electric - Bridgestone MB-1 Mountain Bike
Dave B
MB-1-E
<a href="http://visforvoltage.org/book-page/996-mountain-bike-conversion-24v-3-4h... - Bridgestone MB-1 Mountain Bike</a>
` :?
Message from the Inventor
In 1997 I visited a pedicab manufacturer who was experimenting with an electric-powered version of their pedicab (bicycle taxi). From previous projects, I knew that electric vehicles were impractical in terms of range, recharge time, and weight; the only advantage I could see was their attractiveness from an in-use emissions perspective (ignoring their environmental impact during manufacturing and recycling/disposal). In the case of the pedicabs, the electric motor and batteries added a massive 130 pounds to an already heavy vehicle. Most of this weight was due to the low storage density of batteries. In fact, most common form of batteries, lead acid, have a storage density of about 35 Watt-hours/Kilogram (more expensive batteries such as Lithium Ion, only store about 150 Watt-hours/Kilogram) while the energy stored in gasoline is 12,000 Watt-hours/Kilogram.
So I thought to myself, "How do you power a bicycle with a clean gasoline engine?" I continued to think, "Would it is possible to design a bicycle wheel with a gasoline engine built right into the wheel?" The trick was to have the entire engine, geartrain, starter, geartrain, and starter be so thin that the whole assembly could spin between the forks of a standard bicycle. This spinning assembly (i.e. wheel with engine) could be cooled because it spins and not by a massive flywheel with a fan. In addition, I sought a solution that would allow anyone to install it on most bicycles and be easy to use.
Thus began an interesting journey of discovery and experimentation. From the earliest prototypes, we progressed from stage to stage over a period of several years. In 2002, I filed a comprehensive patent, and just a year later in 2003 we founded RevoPower. Therefore, in 2003 I was able to go to work full time on the project.
The technical challenges and obstacles we faced are too numerous to mention - keep an eye out for my book! However, those of you who are technically minded (or have engineering training) can see from the photographs that the important challenges involved delivering fuel to a rotating engine, throttle control through the axle, and miniaturization of ignition system.
What we will deliver in the next year is a reliable and practical motor-assistance device which will reduce the world's dependence on oil, remove congestion from crowded roads, and transform third world economies. I look forward with great anticipation to seeing fleets of RevoPower bikes heading down roads across the world.
Thank you for visiting our website. I hope you share our passion for this product.
STEVE KATSAROS
CTO, RevoPower
Peace Out,
Gman
Now that we have clarified our beliefs, your invited to join us as we begin building on them to define our Community Mission Statement
Peace Out, <img src="http://tinyurl.com/ysafbn">
Gman
` ;)
I know it's not a EV, but it's a very good option for those of us that have to travel greater distances and are concerned about decreasing our Fossil Fuel usage. There is a very good illustration in Popular Science about the Revo Power Wheel.
Revo Power Wheel Gallery & Video
Comment on Mission Statement
Submitted by MB-1-E on Sun, 05/13/2007 - 01:28.
Peace Out,
Gman
What is your vision for the future our growing community?
Peace Out, <img src="http://tinyurl.com/ysafbn">
Gman
When will they sell their product?
`The7,
Welcome to V is for Voltage Community, you can check out there FAQ.
I hope they have a better calendar than EVT America used to announce there Z-20. :)
The next thing is to figure out how to get it to run on used vegetable oil or something similar.
Peace Out,
Gman
What is your vision for the future our growing community?
Peace Out, <img src="http://tinyurl.com/ysafbn">
Gman
I saw the videos of this one in action after the Popular Science article came out. Looks interesting. I wonder how loud it would be though. The videos didn't have any sound, strangely enough. 2-stroke engines are notoriously loud.
Plus, it's not electric. So, that's the first strike against it.
kringle777
Red XM-2000
Moss Green "Charger" ebike
Sacramento, CA
kringle777
Red XM-2000
Moss Green "Charger" ebike
Sacramento, CA
Sounds like a terrible idea.
Nice clean, quiet electric bikes are so very nice.
Richard
It's better than driving the SUV if you have to go over 20 miles to work, and have no where to recharge.
If someone wanted to make a "Hybrid" electic/gas bicycle, this would be an easy way to go. Especially if the electric motor could made to charge from the wheel going around when under IC power.
Why do this.
When you have to go futher than the electric will go or need to pull a load the electric would not do well pulling.